To vaccinate or not to vaccinate. A question that some parents spend
countless hours agonizing over. The decision not to vaccinate did not come
easily for us. It came only after deciding NOT to do anything "just because
everyone else did it". It came after being okay with questioning what is
considered to be the societal norm. It came after reading everything pro and
con that we could find. And finally, it came after weighing what we saw to be the
risks of the vaccines and of the individual diseases.
What we found didn't prove to us that injecting a toxic chemical cocktail into
our precious newborn baby was a risk worth taking. No one talks about the
risks of vaccines, only the disease risks. The vaccine risks are there. They
can also be found listed on the inserts that accompany vaccines. The
same ones that your doctors are supposed to be showing you.
As my research continued, I started to see a pattern of what I can only describe as lies. Vaccines
supposedly were the MAIN and ONLY reason for the decline of many childhood
illnesses based on everything I had been told my entire life. Yet, the
research I found showed that the diseases had been in decline for in some cases
more than 40 years prior to mass vaccine introduction. The pro vaccine graphs showed the decline starting only at
the date
vaccinations were introduced (where each and every time there is a spike). Conveniently, avoiding the fact that they had
been in steady decline prior to the vaccine introduction. There are many, many
reasons that we decided not to vaccinate. Below are a few of them.
It is beyond my comprehension that medical doctors (who are sworn to cause no harm) find it
not only safe to inject newborns lacking a developed immune system with chemicals and other
ingredients but deem it not even worth mentioning as a concern. Chemicals such as;
formaldehyde (a carcinogen), aluminum, MSG, aborted fetal tissue, animal blood
and organ tissue, methanol, borax, to name a few. It just doesn't make any sense. No matter how much I read, I can not find anything stating these things are healthful in anyway. Let's not even discuss thimersol, which while mostly now eliminated there are still traces of it.
I just love the "a little bit of exposure to toxins is okay" theory, especially when used in
conjunction with a chemical like thimersol which is accumulative.
http://www.vaclib.org/basic/vacingredient.htm
http://www.vaccination.inoz.com/ingredie.html
http://www.drgreene.com/21_522.html
Killer Diseases?
Many of the diseases vaccinated for are NOT the killers that we are led to
believe. I keep thinking of the chicken pox commercial that I saw on
television. It was talking about losing your baby to chicken pox and
how you didn't want that to happen so hurry and get your kids vaccinated.
I guess if you aren't as old as I am, you wouldn't know that
EVERYBODY used to get chicken pox when they were kids. It is NOT the killer
disease that the commercial said it was. Even the
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) advised in it's 1996 brochure, "most
children who are otherwise healthy and get chickenpox won't have any
complications from the disease."
Chicken Pox
Most people who contract Chicken Pox are left with life long immunity without
any complications. However, now we are creating an entire population of
adults who never had Chicken Pox because they were vaccinated for it as
children. Why the concern? Vaccines usually only provide temporary immunity.
And that means, that adults are now more susceptible to Chicken Pox which IS a
problem since Chicken Pox in adults is a much more serious illness with a
higher rate of severe complications. Many parents are looking to expose their
children to chicken pox in order to obtain that lifelong immunity and avoid
adult chicken pox. Here's a new group that will hopefully help;
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chickenpoxparties
"The real problem here is inventing the problem to sell the solution. What the
government has done is to demonize what, a generation ago, was considered a
benign disease in well nourished populations. Measles is not a random killer
among well nourished children. In the five years between 1989-1994 there were
only six deaths among children aged 0-19 with 59,263 cases of measles; an
average of one death a year. Children in the West do not die of measles when
they are well nourished. Doctors also better understand how to treat
complications. Even in Africa, children with adequate stores of vitamin A stop
dying of measles."
Rubella, better known as German Measles is a VERY mild childhood disease. The
symptoms are so mild that it often goes undiagnosed. Babies are vaccinated
against Rubella ONLY because they are accessible. The concern being that
pregnant mothers' unborn babies exposed to Rubella can suffer serious damage.
THIS is the reason we vaccinate all babies, boys and girls against Rubella. I
wonder why the campaign wasn't geared toward women wanting to become pregnant.
When my husband and I first decided we wanted to have a baby, the first thing
we did BEFORE starting to try to conceive was to both go for medical check ups.
This is where we learned that I needed to be tested for the Rubella
antibodies. If I didn't have them, I would need the vaccination and then
shouldn't try to get pregnant for a few months. Isn't this about personal
accountability? Did someone somewhere actually say, "oh we can't count on
women taking the proper precautions so let's vaccinate the infants when we have
them - even though we don't really know for sure if the antibodies produced
will last through to the childbearing years".
http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/diseases/facts/germanmeasles.htm
http://www.whale.to/m/butler2.html
Conflict of Interest!
Those that are "given" the power to make vaccine rule and law are financially
tied to the profits of vaccines. How is this acceptable to anyone?